<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Umney's Alley - RSS Feed</title>
<description>Feed for ClydeUmney.net, personal webpage of Josh Mauthe. 
	You can read book and movie reviews, get my infrequent thoughts, or browse 
	picture galleries.</description>

<item>
<title>Movie Log: Pusher Trilogy / **** ½</title>
<link>http://www.clydeumney.net/movielog.htm#0726a</link>
<pubDate>Sunday, 26 Jul 2010 :: CDT</pubDate>
<description>A very loose sort of trilogy, Nicolas 
      Winding Refn's <em>Pusher </em>series concerns itself with the ins and outs 
      of criminal life in Denmark, with each film following a different (but connected) 
      main character. Despite the pounding, intense introduction to each film, 
      the <em>Pusher </em>series is refreshingly down-to-earth, with a minimum 
      of flair or stylistic touches (which is especially surprising, given the 
      hyper-stylized <em>Bronson</em>, which Refn later made), instead choosing 
      to recreate the seedy life of drug dealers, kingpins, and car thieves in 
      as realistic a way as possible. All three films have a similar trajectory, 
      with the main character already being established, even successful in the 
      life, before having things go wrong through events not entirely in their 
      own control. Even so, it's fascinating to watch Refn play with different 
      ideas here, with the original film perhaps being the most straightforward 
      crime movie, focusing on a drug dealer who finds himself in a run of bad 
      luck and owing a lot of money to very bad men. <em>Pusher II</em> focuses 
      on a young man fresh out of prison grappling with an unloving and hateful 
      father and the discovery that he may have a son of his own, while <em>Pusher 
      III</em> focuses on the drug lord who has been overseeing the last two movies, 
      creating a fascinating sort of sympathy for a character we didn't expect 
      to have such feelings for. Like the <em>Red Riding Trilogy</em>, the series 
      manages to be a little more than the sum of its parts, creating a complex 
      and fascinating underworld driven by genuine people, not figureheads. This 
      isn't <em>The Wire</em> - Refn isn't interested in social commentary or 
      ideology. Rather, this is a look at people in the criminal world and what 
      drives them, getting into their heads and under their skins, and the result 
      is pretty compelling stuff.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Movie Log: Seven Samurai / *****</title>
<link>http://www.clydeumney.net/movielog.htm#0725a</link>
<pubDate>Monday, 26 Jul 2010 20:26:32 CDT</pubDate>
<description>What is there really left to say about <em>Seven 
      Samurai </em>that hasn't been said better elsewhere? It's my second time 
      seeing a print of this on the big screen, and I hope it's not my last. If 
      you've never seen it, don't let the length intimidate you - there's not 
      a minute wasted in all 207, and by the time you're at the intermission, 
      the only concept you have about how long it's been is sadness that you have 
      so little left. Iconic performances by everyone abound, but how wonderful 
      is Mifune's swagger, or Shimura's quiet humor and leadership? How much fun 
      is it to watch Kurosawa pace himself through the simple story, allowing 
      all of the characters time to breathe and be people, first and foremost, 
      and allow them to be neither heroes nor villains, but something more complex? 
      How exhilarating are the action sequences, told simply yet effectively? 
      And how flawless is the ending, and that beautiful final shot? It's easy 
      to take <em>Seven Samurai </em>for granted, but every watch reminds me not 
      only what a magnificent film it is, but also what an enjoyable one - how 
      much joy and fun it packs into its running time. What a perfect film, and 
      what a treat to see. It's a reminder of why I love film so much in the first 
      place. </description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Movie Log: Purple Rain / *</title>
<link>http://www.clydeumney.net/movielog.htm#0723c</link>
<pubDate>Saturday, 24 Jul 2010 12:13:14 CDT</pubDate>
<description>You can probably raise this rating by one star 
      if you're a big fan of Prince, as his music is about the only thing worth 
      watching in the movie. Me, I could give or take his music, so I'm left watching 
      this movie wander into overly long musical performances that are badly filmed, 
      ridiculous efforts at acting that wouldn't pass muster in a first year acting 
      class, a contrived and melodramatic story that never rises above the level 
      of &quot;laughable&quot;, and characters who would kill to have a full one-dimension 
      among them. <em>Purple Rain </em>is, simply put, pretty awful. I can't deny 
      that Morris Day and Jerome are clearly having fun, but I can't tell if they're 
      having fun at the expense of the awful material or simply awful and making 
      the material funnier as a result. If you're a Prince fan, I guess you'll 
      like it. But as a movie, it's hard to come up with anything interesting 
      or good in the entire running time, except as unintentional parody of how 
      incredible Prince thinks he is.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Movie Log: Northfork / **</title>
<link>http://www.clydeumney.net/movielog.htm#0723b</link>
<pubDate>Saturday, 24 Jul 2010 12:08:04 CDT</pubDate>
<description>I really enjoyed the Polish brothers' first movie, 
      <em>Twin Falls Idaho</em>, and I do have to say that <em>Northfork </em>maintains 
      that same beautiful, rich look and gorgeous cinematography. Unfortunately, 
      it's wasted on a pretentious, overly &quot;quirky&quot; story that's more 
      about surreal moments than actual characters or people. <em>Northfork </em>is 
      the story of a small town which is about to be washed away by the construction 
      of a new dam, and the efforts to clear out the town by a few groups of men 
      who travel house to house in an effort to clear the town. The movie's cast 
      is incredible but largely wasted, and in the end the movie is more interested 
      in being odd and offbeat than good. I'll be honest - I had largely tuned 
      out by the halfway point, even as I watched it as I worked. It's all still 
      beautiful, but it descends into arty junk by the end.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Movie Log: Babe: Pig in the City / ****</title>
<link>http://www.clydeumney.net/movielog.htm#0723a</link>
<pubDate>Saturday, 24 Jul 2010 10:28:18 CDT</pubDate>
<description>I watched this based off of <a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/the-new-cult-canon-babe-pig-in-the-city,2221/" target="_blank">Scott 
      Tobias's write-up for the AV Club's New Cult Canon</a>, expecting an odd 
      curiosity; what I got was something wholly better - and stranger - than 
      I expected. It's as though they handed the film off to the team responsible 
      for <em>Delicatessen </em>and let Roald Dahl have a crack at writing it, 
      and the results are gleefully dark, yet with all of the big heart and sweet 
      optimism of the original nonetheless present. It's no surprise to me that 
      this failed - it's fairly offbeat, and the film feels so much darker and 
      less hopeful than the original. Yet, at the same time, I'm not surprised 
      to find the film having a devoted following. Its look, feel, and humor aren't 
      like much else out there, and there's no denying that it's a work with its 
      own unique tone to it. I'm telling you, if you're a fan of the offbeat - 
      there's a lot of Gilliam here, as well as Jeunet - you owe it to yourself 
      to give this a shot.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Movie Log: The Stepfather (1987) / ****</title>
<link>http://www.clydeumney.net/movielog.htm#0722b</link>
<pubDate>Friday, 23 Jul 2010 13:15:17 CDT</pubDate>
<description>Sure, <em>The Stepfather </em>suffers from lot 
      of the usual problems with '80s slasher flicks - a dull, &quot;unstoppable 
      killer&quot; climax, some cheesy synth music, a couple of needless digressions 
      - but in this case, it's more than made up for by the ideas that the movie's 
      playing with, as well as the great performance by Terry O'Quinn as the titular 
      parent figure. O'Quinn is a serial murderer - he marries a family, lives 
      with them, kills them, and moves on. But what makes him so fascinating is 
      his motivation - he is driven by and obsessed with the &quot;perfect family&quot; 
      - the 50s, <em>Father Knows Best</em>, suburbia, the whole nine yards. And 
      when things don't fit his perfect picture - a daughter who resents school 
      and gets in fights, a wife who questions her husband's wishes - he flips 
      out. As a dark satire of life under Reagan, <em>The Stepfather </em>has 
      a nasty sense of humor to it, but even as just a slasher film, the way it 
      toys with our American ideals is a lot of fun. And really, I can't say enough 
      great about O'Quinn here, who really plays all the layers of his deranged 
      Daddy perfectly. It's a lot of fun, and packed with great ideas that really 
      make it stand out.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Movie Log: This is England / *****</title>
<link>http://www.clydeumney.net/movielog.htm#0722a</link>
<pubDate>Friday, 23 Jul 2010 13:14:15 CDT</pubDate>
<description>A quiet knockout of a film, <em>This is England 
      </em>tells the story of a young British boy still reeling from the recent 
      death of his father in the Falkland War and coping with bullies every day. 
      One day, he meets an outgoing young skinhead who takes pity on him, finally 
      giving the boy the chance to belong somewhere, and the film goes from there. 
      Unlike, say. <em>American History X</em>, <em>This is England</em> is far 
      less plot-driven, letting the interactions between the characters drive 
      the story, and frequently just losing itself in quiet moments as people 
      talk and goof around. The result is a movie that has lots to say - taking 
      on Thatcher's politics, the appeal of skinheads and cults, the importance 
      of family, and more - but one that never gets preachy or didactic. Even 
      the most outspoken and virulent among the skinheads is given depth and humanity, 
      and its this respect for the characters that gives <em>This is England</em> 
      its power. Between the outstanding performances and the pitch-perfect re-creation 
      of the era, <em>This is England </em>is a fantastic piece of work, one that 
      not only grapples with strong ideas but one that also leaves a genuine impact 
      on the viewer and creates characters that linger after the movie ends.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Movie Log: Beyond the Valley of the Dolls / **** ½</title>
<link>http://www.clydeumney.net/movielog.htm#0721b</link>
<pubDate>Wednesday, 21 Jul 2010 19:13:06 CDT</pubDate>
<description>After the emotional gutpunch of <em>Deliver Us 
      From Evil</em>, I needed something a little lighter. And man, was <em>Beyond 
      the Valley of the Dolls </em>ever the right choice. It blows my mind that 
      some people don't realize that this is a satire; without giving away the 
      details of the completely batshit nuts third act, the use of the 20th Century 
      Fox fanfare as soundtrack during a particularly memorable moment <em>has 
      </em>to be a tipoff, doesn't it? Written by a couple of guys (including 
      Roger Ebert!) who openly admitted knowing nothing about the scene they were 
      depicting; directed by a man known for sexploitation; and filled with goofy 
      dialogue, rampant nudity, lots of drug use, and a truly bizarre plot that 
      plays out like some insane mixture of <em>Reefer Madness</em>, <em>Josie 
      and the Pussycats</em>, and <em>Helter Skelter</em>, <em>Beyond the Valley</em> 
      is an absolutely gleeful piece of insanity on film, and I loved it. I'll 
      concede that it drags a little bit in the second act, but it's all made 
      up for by the third, which shifts into absolute crazy territory that Ebert 
      admits they made up as they went. It's pure 70s trash, but it's rare to 
      find trash this awesome and enjoyable.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Movie Log: Deliver Us From Evil / *****</title>
<link>http://www.clydeumney.net/movielog.htm#0721a</link>
<pubDate>Wednesday, 21 Jul 2010 19:07:12 CDT</pubDate>
<description>A harrowing, devastating documentary about Oliver 
      O'Grady, a Catholic priest and pedophile who molested children in parish 
      after parish as the church moved him around. <em>Deliver Us From Evil</em> 
      pulls no punches, interviewing the victims and their parents at length and 
      clearly, methodically laying out a case that proves without a doubt the 
      church's culpability in these crimes. That alone would make the movie hard 
      to handle. But <em>Evil</em> takes it all one step further, featuring frank 
      interviews with the very open, very unreticent O'Grady, whose bizarre distance 
      from his crimes (at one point, he writes his victims a letter with an apology 
      for his crimes and an offer to sit down and have lunch sometime, saying 
      that he hopes they can move on now) makes him all the more disturbing and 
      unnerving. As a documentary, <em>Deliver Us From Evil</em> has some problems 
      - it ends with a Michael Moore-esque presentation at the Vatican, and has 
      some overbearing score at some points. But none of that negates the impact 
      of the whole thing, which left me a shattered husk by the time it was finished; 
      between O'Grady's unsettling banal recitation of his crimes and the seeming 
      apathy (ignorance? idiocy?) of the church elders, it's a devastating indictment 
      of the system, and one that should be seen by everyone involved in the debate.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Book Log: Wheels Within Wheels / ***</title>
<link>http://www.clydeumney.net/booklog.htm#0721a</link>
<pubDate>Wednesday, 21 Jul 2010 18:53:07 CDT</pubDate>
<description>Another early Wilson book, and this one is in many ways 
        the exact inverse of <em><a href="http://www.clydeumney.net/booklog.htm#0612b">Healer</a></em> - it has an 
        intriguing story and an interesting world, but characters so thin they're 
        barely present. <em>Wheels Within Wheels </em>is the middle book of Wilson's 
        very loose LaNague trilogy, so it has the advantage of a world already 
        constructed to play around in. And its labyrinthine plotting - which involves 
        an effort to bring down the federation, a long-dead father who may have 
        been murdered, a strange alien world, and lots and lots of libertarian 
        thinking - makes for an intriguing story, but it's hard to care all that 
        much when the characters have almost no personality whatsoever. Still, 
        it's worth remembering that this is an early work for Wilson, and you 
        can see him trying out different ideas here and experimenting. In the 
        end, though, it's only really interesting for fans; new readers should 
        definitely start elsewhere.</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>